所有案件
狼和羊的案件
#103875: "2-round game with switching sides?"
implemented: 此建议已获实施
2
这个案件是关于哪方面的？
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
建议：依我来看，接下来的这些方法十分有助于改善游戏的实现
细节描述
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
Currently, most combinatorial games on BGA are either not strongly solved (e.g. Chess, Checkers, invented games, and etc.), solved but results in a draw with perfect play (e.g. Reversi, Nine Men's Morris, Quarto, etc.), or solved but negates the player position advantage by employing pie rule or its variant (e.g. Gomoku, Pente, etc.).
However, this game is an asymmetric combinatorial game and is described as a solved game (wolves win with perfect play).
Above a certain level of skills, a single round game is likely to depend on the player position.
So, implementing a 2-round mode where players play each side once might be a good idea.• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v119
案件历史
2023年11月13日 20:56 • ufm • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:
Some asymmetric games on BGA also have this option (e.g. Memoir '44, Jekyll vs. Hyde, etc.).
2023年11月13日 20:59 • ufm • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:
Also, the tiebreaker will be needed to prevent endless waves of 1:1 ties.
2023年11月14日 14:35 • Jonathan2004 • 开发者需要更丰富的建议内容:
Thank you for your interest ;)
I think this is a good suggestion.
For now I think I only played 2 games with that kind of 2 round mode :
-Memoir'44 : the game rules state which players get a given number of points in each round, so we understand who is the winner
-Luck Numbers : (not the same kind of solvable game though) again the game rules state which player is the winner in 'tournament' mode
So we need to find a good way to find the winner in this game, do you think the lesser number of moves is enough ?
For example today I see those 2 tables with the same players :
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439270363 megumaru wins in 17 moves
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439275913 Askeladdd wins in 7 moves
=> Askeladdd should be declared winner of this 2 round game ?
I think this is a good suggestion.
For now I think I only played 2 games with that kind of 2 round mode :
-Memoir'44 : the game rules state which players get a given number of points in each round, so we understand who is the winner
-Luck Numbers : (not the same kind of solvable game though) again the game rules state which player is the winner in 'tournament' mode
So we need to find a good way to find the winner in this game, do you think the lesser number of moves is enough ?
For example today I see those 2 tables with the same players :
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439270363 megumaru wins in 17 moves
- boardgamearena.com/table?table=439275913 Askeladdd wins in 7 moves
=> Askeladdd should be declared winner of this 2 round game ?
增加一些新内容到这篇报告
任何可能重现这项漏洞或了解你的建议之相关资讯，都请在此填写:
- 其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
- 按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
- 问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
- 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
