• 如果有的话，请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 请说明你当时想做什么，你做了什么，然后发生了什么

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 当你被封锁的时候，屏幕上出现了些什么呢？(空白的屏幕？部分游戏平台画面？错误的信息？)

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里？

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 在游戏回放中，是否有不符合游戏规则的地方？如果有的话，请问是在哪一步呢？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动？

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 你在想做什么的时候，触发了这个游戏选项？

• 当你想这么做时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)？

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。

I think there's an issue with the translation for the English rules. It took me a long time to understand how the number of combat cards are determined since the English rules refer to the number of free spaces around the tile. The "free spaces" around the left and right sides of the tile area don't have borders so I didn't consider them to be "free spaces".

Looking at the original French versus the English:

Pour chaque côté vide (sans autre tuile) autour de la choisie, piocher 1 carte Combat.

vs

Draw 1 red card per free space (with no tile) around the tile chosen.

I believe that "côté" translates to "side" in English? That makes a lot more sense to me. Then we count the number of sides without tiles.

If you agree hopefully you can get this feedback on the rules back to the publisher.

In the rules in the Wiki, it's closer to this:

* Draw combat cards: Draw as many Combat cards from your Combat deck as there are free space around the enemy. The top side with water does not count as free sides.

This refers to both "free space" and "free sides". It would be better if the "free space" was changed to "free sides" or "empty sides".

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？