报告 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

独家暗语的案件

#67657: "Collective Voting"

acknowledged: 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

独家暗语 #282066620

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

建议：依我来看，接下来的这些方法十分有助于改善游戏的实现

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

建议：依我来看，接下来的这些方法十分有助于改善游戏的实现

请检查是否已有同课题案件

若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

细节描述

案件历史

2022年Jul10日 00:33 • CaptainTenille • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

not a bug, just a suggestion

2022年Jul10日 01:00 • KuWizard • 开发者认为这是个馊主意，或投资报酬率过低:

That's how it was implemented as a first draft. People from publishing company (Repos Production) played with 7 players and decided that it kills the game pace and slows down it a lot. So they asked to do the next player verification only. Pretty sure they won't decide to change back

2022年Jul10日 01:24 • CaptainTenille • 开发者认为这是个馊主意，或投资报酬率过低:

so it's better to have duplicate clues got through?

2022年Jul10日 06:51 • Pompkin • 开发者认为这是个馊主意，或投资报酬率过低:

for live games it is easily fixed with a countdown timer of something like 10-15 seconds for all the cluegivers when the words are presented. If nobody clicks the duplicate/invalid clue button in that time game just progress as normal. It will both speed up the average waiting time for approving clues and increase the likelihood of catching errors.

2022年Jul10日 09:00 • KuWizard • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

Ok, timer could save the situation, I'll try to present this idea if more people vote for this one (it's just 1 vote at the moment)

2022年Jul10日 14:14 • CaptainTenille • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

Since it already has been implemented before, can't it just be an option when setting up the game? If the players want it, they just check the box and get the experience that they want.

2022年Jul11日 16:09 • Pompkin • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

another problem with letting just 1 player approve of the clues is that they are very likely to improve one of their own clues that break the rules as they wouldnt give that rule breaking clue in the first place if they know the rules.

2022年Jul11日 16:10 • Pompkin • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

improve=approve

2022年Jul28日 02:16 • FT3 • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

I came here to make the same report, the countdown timer for everyone sounds like a very neat solution to the problem.

2022年Sep11日 10:42 • OutOfHabit • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

I would love to see this change implemented, at least as an option .

Maybe an ability to mark a word as Wrong (X) or as Question (?) (and the rest are ok to keep)

Question lets the group know you want opinions about a word
Wrong (X) means you think it should go

Anyone can choose to just abstain from joining that part of they want,
And probably still on one person to submit it each time, rotating as it does now

2022年Oct26日 14:27 • Livini • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

#311910257

A player cancelled a perfectly valid clue (Shrek) and didn't cancel two identical clues with different (British/American) spelling (Grey and Gray). Mistakes like this could have been avoided if we'd voted collectively.
A countdown timer would be great so it doesn't slow down the pacing!

2022年Nov2日 09:13 • MIB5799 • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

Possible option: Have only 3 players do approval instead of all 6. Still much much better than only one.

Or even just 2 (with rotating tiebreaker like in Similo).

2022年Dec14日 17:45 • bananasplay • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

Make this a table option when creating a game so that players can decide for themselves:
Next player's choice
Collective voting
Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).

2024年Mar7日 17:13 • TheInquisitor • 开发者认同这是个好点子，并希望去实现它:

> Any single player chooses (This last one would be especially useful for turn-based games where some players are more frequently online than others--I trust the people whom I play with and they trust me--but it's annoying to have the game slowed down needlessly because the implementation is forcing us to wait on the slowest player).

This option would be a great help for friends who are just playing the infinite game amongst themselves.

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

任何可能重现这项漏洞或了解你的建议之相关资讯，都请在此填写:

其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

取消更新报告

#67657: "Collective Voting"

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

请检查是否已有同课题案件

细节描述

案件历史

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

更改案件状态为：

帮助

贡献

导航

关注我们