#45389: "Change recommend player count to 7"
这个案件是关于哪方面的？
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
请检查是否已有同课题案件
若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
细节描述
-
• 如果有的话，请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.
Change recommend player count to 7
-
• 请说明你当时想做什么，你做了什么，然后发生了什么
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v14.1
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
Change recommend player count to 7
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v14.1
-
• 当你被封锁的时候，屏幕上出现了些什么呢？(空白的屏幕？部分游戏平台画面？错误的信息？)
Change recommend player count to 7
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v14.1
-
• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里？
Change recommend player count to 7
-
• 在游戏回放中，是否有不符合游戏规则的地方？如果有的话，请问是在哪一步呢？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v14.1
-
• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动？
Change recommend player count to 7
-
• 你在想做什么的时候，触发了这个游戏选项？
-
• 当你想这么做时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v14.1
-
• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)？
Change recommend player count to 7
-
• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v14.1
-
• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
Change recommend player count to 7
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v14.1
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
Change recommend player count to 7
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v14.1
案件历史
In bgg voting 7player (67% voted) is much more suggested than 5 (only 30%).
If the suggested setting is switch to 7, it is easier to play in 7, since currently simply mode players would automatically make a 5p table (they would follow suggested player count), They would take away people once it reaches 5, and make it harder to wait for 7people.
Thanks for helping.
I also propose changing suggested player count of Skull, from 3 to 6. It's me in that report too! :D
boardgamearena.com/bug?id=39056
in 5p it is quite difficult not for the sheriff team to win (assume they are experienced), unless people can find and kill the vice first, but it's hard. And for situation when a full hp sheriff, a vice and another guy left, it's almost a guarantee win (a vice should agree not to play a miss / beer, and let his hp drop to 1, with the other player. if the other player do not agree, he is discovered. if he agrees, he lost when 1v1 to sheriff).
in 7p adding 1 outlaws and 1 vice is too beneficial to the sheriff side (there are double amount of vice, but only 50% increase in size for outlaws).
I haven't tried 6, hope it would be better!
I also find the game unexpectably slow, often has 15-20 minutes to play, just to see who has better cards and win once all roles become clear. decision making does not matter that much, and the social deduction part doesn't affect much in the game.
But your forget the Renegade, the first half of the game, he acts as a Vice(Deputy) too.
Adding 1 outlaw and 1 vice is actually beneficial for the outlaws. You always have the Sheriff buffed (+1 life, first move of the game) and Renegade swinging for balance but slightly in favor for law (since Sheriff must survive). So let's say these elements add .5 to the law side. Then, in 5p, it is 2 vs 2.5 and in 7p it is 3 vs 3.5. The marginal benefit is thus smaller (but still existent) for the law in a 7p game.
增加一些新内容到这篇报告
- 其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
- 按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
- 问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
- 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
