报告 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

大话骰的案件

#44475: "Rules seem to use a hybrid of modern and traditional bidding"

confirmed: 漏洞已经被游戏开发者确认了

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

大话骰 #185562348

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

游戏平台不让我作一些游戏规则所允许的游戏行动

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

游戏平台不让我作一些游戏规则所允许的游戏行动

请检查是否已有同课题案件

若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

细节描述

案件历史

2021年Jul8日 00:00 • BenCarey88 • 漏洞尚未被修复:

We were playing with the recent update that allows using the traditional bidding style, where you can bid lower dice values over higher values so long as you increase the number of dice (thanks for making that update!)

My understanding of the traditional rules is that (excluding pacos) each bid has to fit one of the following two conditions:
- AT LEAST as many dice as the previous bid and a HIGHER VALUE on the dice
- MORE dice than the previous bid and ANY VALUE on the dice

It seems like the rules here instead require one of these two conditions:
- EXACTLY as many dice as the previous bid and a HIGHER VALUE on the dice
- MORE dice than the previous bid and A LOWER OR EQUAL VALUE on the dice

So for example I would expect to be able to bid 7 sixes over 6 threes, but the game will only let me bid 6 sixes. Is this a bug or do I just have a misunderstanding of the traditional rules?

Thanks :)

2021年Jul9日 10:19 • Valawala • 漏洞已经被游戏开发者确认了:

I actually noted this issue when adding the traditional bidding, but chose not to address it at the time for a couple of reasons:
- There are a lot of different sets of rules available for this game (including Liar's Dice, the commercially published game Perudo, and other online rules for traditional Perudo), and I haven't read most of them in any detail. I wanted to avoid changing something only to find out people already thought it was right how it was.
- There are no previously existing community requests for this change, and even if it is a correct reflection of most versions of the rules, I am hesitant to swap something people are definitely playing for something that they might also like to play.

For these reasons I will keep an eye on this bug and any similar reports that pop up, but it's likely that I will avoid making this change until/unless there is pressure from a lot of Perudo players to do so.

2021年Jul9日 10:27 • BenCarey88 • 漏洞已经被游戏开发者确认了:

Hey, thanks for the quick response! Yeah that makes sense, no worries :)

2021年Jul9日 14:00 • emorrp1 • 漏洞已经被游戏开发者确认了:

Fair enough, adding my support to always be able to overbid. We played the commercial Perudo in the 90s.

2021年Jul28日 06:13 • mfl134 • 漏洞已经被游戏开发者确认了:

I agree that this is implemented differently than expect. 7 sixes should be a valid bid over 4 fours, but it is not allowed.

all higher bids should be allowed. the current implementation is some bizarra hybrid.

2022年May9日 14:36 • Herian • 漏洞已经被游戏开发者确认了:

These rules make no sense. In a current game I'm playing, another player just raised from 6 fives to 7 pacos, an absolutely huge raise.

Then in the next round, the last player bid 5 threes and I want to bid fives but I'm limited to bidding 5 of them.

I should have the option to make a high bid if I want to, to pressure my opponents and try to make sure the action doesn't get back round to me.

I've been playing this game on BGA since before the traditional bidding style was introduced, but I didn't notice this restriction until now, possibly just because the scenario never came up where I wanted to make this kind of bid. I definitely think the game should allow higher bids of any number.

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

任何可能重现这项漏洞或了解你的建议之相关资讯，都请在此填写:

其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

取消更新报告

#44475: "Rules seem to use a hybrid of modern and traditional bidding"

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

请检查是否已有同课题案件

细节描述

案件历史

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

更改案件状态为：

帮助

贡献

导航

关注我们