#44245: "Problem with Epidemic cities"
这个案件是关于哪方面的？
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
请检查是否已有同课题案件
若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
细节描述
-
• 如果有的话，请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
-
• 请说明你当时想做什么，你做了什么，然后发生了什么
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
-
• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
-
• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
-
• 当你被封锁的时候，屏幕上出现了些什么呢？(空白的屏幕？部分游戏平台画面？错误的信息？)
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
-
• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里？
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
-
• 在游戏回放中，是否有不符合游戏规则的地方？如果有的话，请问是在哪一步呢？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
-
• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动？
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
-
• 你在想做什么的时候，触发了这个游戏选项？
-
• 当你想这么做时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
-
• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)？
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
-
• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
-
• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
-
• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
-
• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
I think there is a bug in the algorithm that picks which card is drawn immediately after an epidemic card is drawn. In almost every game I have played thus far (and sometimes multiple times within one game) a epidemic card is played, a city is drawn, and then the first card drawn for the infection stage is the very same city that just got hit with an epidemic, leading to an automatic outbreak every time. It never is the 2nd or 3rd city drawn, always the first city. The odds of this happening so many times just due to chance are very slim
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v91
案件历史
I came to the very same conclusion of OP in my games, and I agree that almost everytime it's the very 1st card. Last game it was the 2nd for the first time in my games, but probably that could have been a "legit not bugged" draw.
These are last 2 games:
boardgamearena.com/gamereview?table=188636475 (2/5)
boardgamearena.com/gamereview?table=188636475 (2/4)
I talked about this in chat and everyone replyed that it was just bad luck. After these 2 games all agreed with me :P
So I'd check the algorithm just to make sure it's not really RNG making fun of us (with statistics that don't make sense). :P
I have checked the algorithm and didn't see any issue.
I have to remember you that after an Epidemic, cards previously played are shuffled ON THE TOP of the deck. So the odds to get the same card twice are not so small.
boardgamearena.com/8/pandemic?table=222271433
boardgamearena.com/8/pandemic?table=222272183
c'est un bug que l'on retrouve très très souvent (environ 2 fois sur 3), après une épidémie c'est la même ville qui ressort et explose. En jeu de carte normal c'est pas possible comme probabilité
Je vois ce bug signalé depuis longtemps et non encore traité ... C'est bien dommage
增加一些新内容到这篇报告
- 其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
- 按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
- 问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
- 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
