报告 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

太阳之外的案件

#37787: "Not all Technology cards not revealed"

open: 漏洞尚未被修复

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

太阳之外 #160469552

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

规则：有一条游戏规则没写进游戏程序里

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

规则：有一条游戏规则没写进游戏程序里

请检查是否已有同课题案件

若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

细节描述

案件历史

2021年Apr1日 19:49 • MasN • 漏洞尚未被修复:

This is important, since the cards go to the bottom of the deck and the deck is not shuffled. Thus a later player may use the information of which technology is out of the pool to decide what technologies they want to research.

2021年Apr1日 20:02 • Mogri • 漏洞尚未被修复:

This information is helpful at high levels of play, but most players won't have memorized the technologies, and telling them that Bio-Synaptic Network is now at the bottom of the deck isn't very helpful, because they probably don't know what that card is.

On the one hand, we could say that's fine: new players don't know the contents of the decks anyway, so it's less important that they know which card is on bottom.

On the other hand, it further disadvantages all but the most experienced players, which is undesirable. You shouldn't have to know the name of every technology to be able to play well.

For that reason, I'm not inclined to simply add a log message telling which cards are now at the bottom, but if you have a solution to bridge that gap, I'm willing to rethink that. Perhaps listing all of the technology cards in the "How to play?" or "Strategy tips" sections -- it wouldn't help non-English players, but it would be better than nothing.

2021年Apr2日 04:48 • MasN • 漏洞尚未被修复:

Well, first of all, I believe this is a game rule, not an "advanced variant" to reveal all technologies.

However, I agree that not memorizing the technologies would hurt new people, as well as people who know remember technologies by their color pair rather than their name.

One thing that comes to mind is the UI for the advanced research cards in eminient domain on this site. The stacks are shown beside the board, and clicking a stack would show all cards in it. So we could have a II stack, III stack, and IIII stack. This would be a lot easier to reference than a list in Strategy Tips.

2021年May21日 12:11 • lorean • 漏洞尚未被修复:

This is true, it's a game rule. In the physical board game you have to turn over these cards to discover the technologies that follow the color of the tech you're researching until you have 2. It's one of the advantages of digital implementation that you can have that kind of activity done automatically for you, but it does change the rules and knowledge of the game.

Since it's a board game first and a digital implementation second, it should follow the rules of the game.

Regardless of how "undesirable" it is to have a high skill ceiling.

2021年Jul4日 11:14 • Thyrus • 漏洞尚未被修复:

I agree with the above posters that this is a rule of the game and therefore should be implemented. Moreover, it is not just about raising the skill ceiling (i.e., comparing inexperienced players with experienced ones).

It also changes the balance of the game when playing among experts: The later one researches unknown technologies, the more informed the decision about the color becomes (i.e. if the first player to reach a level 4 tech puts a few additional cards at the bottom, one can easily obtain a scenario where for some colors one has the guarantee to have some technology as one of the two choices). After all, there are only 4 possible matches for every color at level 4, and most of these are shared with other colors. Not having this information removes a significant advantage the rules give to the second/third player to pick up a level 4 tech.

2021年Dec13日 13:37 • victorl • 漏洞尚未被修复:

It’s not just that the drawn cards aren’t displayed. I think the cards are actually randomly chosen every time from those remaining, which means that you can get the same card twice without seeing all the cards of that color and level. This makes the chance of “fishing” for a card much worse.

2022年Mar9日 17:00 • Icantdrawanime • 漏洞尚未被修复:

Seconding victorl's statement. Our game just had an instance of this where we expected the last un-revealed red tech to pop up but it didn't, causing a player to lose the game because he couldn't get access to the T4 tech researching tool he needed.

This needs to be fixed since the current implementation of tech card draws violates the rules of the game, which explicitly require all techs of a color to be revealed before cycling occurs.

2022年Mar9日 17:06 • Icantdrawanime • 漏洞尚未被修复:

This bug occurred on table #248602595

It occurred on purple player's 3rd to last turn. He pulled a repeat red tech and did not pull planetary scale research, which had not yet been seen in the game.

2023年Feb24日 17:12 • jakajaka2 • 漏洞尚未被修复:

Reproduced at table #350007969. Purple player (me, jakajaka2) researched level 2 blue tech with all but 3 blue techs seen during the game, only 1/3 of which showed up in the selection instead of the guaranteed 2/3. This happened to be the only one of the 3 possibilities that did not suit the game plan.

It's really frustrating difference from game rules, as it makes planning ahead more difficult than it should be. I can image that beginners don't pay too much attention to the lengthy playlog anyways, so it wouldn't necessary make the experience that much worse to add log entry with the revealed techs.

2023年May19日 23:55 • Keithustus • 漏洞尚未被修复:

I don't see a "Vote for this report" button so am posting my support. Have a dropbox or something in the log showing which cards were non-selects for color.

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

任何可能重现这项漏洞或了解你的建议之相关资讯，都请在此填写:

其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

取消更新报告

#37787: "Not all Technology cards not revealed"

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

请检查是否已有同课题案件

细节描述

案件历史

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

更改案件状态为：

帮助

贡献

导航

关注我们