报告 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

黑桃王的案件

#25677: "For a nil bid, the partner's books are not added to team bid."

notabug: 这不是一个漏洞

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

黑桃王 #115159298

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

规则：有一条游戏规则没写进游戏程序里

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

规则：有一条游戏规则没写进游戏程序里

请检查是否已有同课题案件

若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

细节描述

案件历史

2020年Oct3日 04:12 • R o d n e y • 漏洞尚未被修复:

imgur.com/a/UAS1gGF

2020年Oct4日 00:10 • VinceS • 这不是一个漏洞:

The situatiation you are describing is according to the rules used for this implementation (see rules link to pagat.com)
"The usual rule is that when a nil fails, the tricks won by the nil bidder do not count towards making the partner's bid, but do count as bags for the team."

2020年Oct4日 06:06 • mimne • 这不是一个漏洞:

Can we have this be an option?
I get that it's the usual rule, but it does seem to be pretty punitive

2020年Oct10日 22:44 • sfoozy • 这不是一个漏洞:

Ya, I'm not a fan of this rule and wish it were optional. I know there may be a handful of variants... but logically, it does not make sense not to count a trick that your partner takes just because they had bid NIL. It's a trick ... why is it treated like it's invisible?

2020年Oct27日 11:18 • JusterGame • 这不是一个漏洞:

But if one bids NIL, then the making of any tricks (1) must lead to bags and (2) are not tricks that the player SOUGHT to win, so shouldn't count as though they were.

Further, if they DID, and if the non-zero partner also got MORE than they bid, then logically the zero player's tricks should ALSO count as bags within their partner's score. You can't have your cake AND eat it !

2020年Oct27日 12:37 • VinceS • 这不是一个漏洞:

I guess the logic here is, that as soon as one player bids nil, the team is seperated into two individuals for scoring (because you can get nil only as an individul). After calculating the scores for both players without looking at the partner, the scores are summed up for the team.

The tricks of the Partner do not count for the nil-bid and the tricks of the nil-player do not count for his partner.

Example:
Player 1 -> Bid 0 / Got 2 Tricks --> -100 for Nil-bid / 2 Bags (took more tricks than he/she bid)
Player 2 -> Bid 4 Got 5 Tricks --> 40 for Bid / 1 Bag (took more than bid)
Team --> - 60 Points / 3 Bags

This seems logical to me

2020年Nov2日 23:35 • mimne • 这不是一个漏洞:

It's totally logical, and the correct rule, and it should be the default for sure. It's just, it's hard enough to get people to play Spades, and this is a common house rule that fits with it being a team game so if it's possible to have it be an option, that'd be nice. :) Clearly this is not a must have, nor is it high priority.

2020年Nov2日 23:38 • mimne • 这不是一个漏洞:

Err, to clarify, I don't think this is a bug, which is how it was originally reported. More like a request? Is it better to file a separate report marking it as a request? Or don't bother? :)

2020年Nov3日 14:46 • Jban • 这不是一个漏洞:

Just to confirm, the way I have always played the game. The nil bid is the only solitary bid in the game, so as a result the 4 bid of the partner is still a team bid. So both players can add to achieving that.

I don't have any official ruling reference, but just wanted to address that the reasoning (initially reported as a bug) is not uncommon.

2020年Dec10日 22:14 • Supergravity • 这不是一个漏洞:

When I was playing money spades, the nil rule was that if you break the partner, you break the nil as well, and if you break the nil, you break the partner as well. In either case the score was just -100, and the bags are the number of tricks by which the partner's bid was exceeded.

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

任何可能重现这项漏洞或了解你的建议之相关资讯，都请在此填写:

其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

取消更新报告

#25677: "For a nil bid, the partner's books are not added to team bid."

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

请检查是否已有同课题案件

细节描述

案件历史

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

更改案件状态为：

帮助

贡献

导航

关注我们