#20186: "Cards issue - Second round"
这个案件是关于哪方面的？
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
请检查是否已有同课题案件
若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
细节描述
-
• 如果有的话，请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. -
• 请说明你当时想做什么，你做了什么，然后发生了什么
Impossible to finish the game because a player cannot play a card.
That happened at table 99339263 and 99330345 too. Second round with the wrong card distribution, same distribution like the first table. The last one, one player had 16, the other 8 and the 2 other players 12.
At the table 99330345 we tried to understand what happened and we shared our hands. We noticed on the second round, the cards not played by the eliminated player (4 cards not played) was not given to the next player and stayed in the same player.
So we thought that was the same bug for the two other tables, one player was eliminated during the first round in the three games. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
-
• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. -
• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？
Impossible to finish the game because a player cannot play a card.
That happened at table 99339263 and 99330345 too. Second round with the wrong card distribution, same distribution like the first table. The last one, one player had 16, the other 8 and the 2 other players 12.
At the table 99330345 we tried to understand what happened and we shared our hands. We noticed on the second round, the cards not played by the eliminated player (4 cards not played) was not given to the next player and stayed in the same player.
So we thought that was the same bug for the two other tables, one player was eliminated during the first round in the three games. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
-
• 当你被封锁的时候，屏幕上出现了些什么呢？(空白的屏幕？部分游戏平台画面？错误的信息？)
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
-
• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里？
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. -
• 在游戏回放中，是否有不符合游戏规则的地方？如果有的话，请问是在哪一步呢？
Impossible to finish the game because a player cannot play a card.
That happened at table 99339263 and 99330345 too. Second round with the wrong card distribution, same distribution like the first table. The last one, one player had 16, the other 8 and the 2 other players 12.
At the table 99330345 we tried to understand what happened and we shared our hands. We noticed on the second round, the cards not played by the eliminated player (4 cards not played) was not given to the next player and stayed in the same player.
So we thought that was the same bug for the two other tables, one player was eliminated during the first round in the three games. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
-
• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动？
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. -
• 你在想做什么的时候，触发了这个游戏选项？
Impossible to finish the game because a player cannot play a card.
That happened at table 99339263 and 99330345 too. Second round with the wrong card distribution, same distribution like the first table. The last one, one player had 16, the other 8 and the 2 other players 12.
At the table 99330345 we tried to understand what happened and we shared our hands. We noticed on the second round, the cards not played by the eliminated player (4 cards not played) was not given to the next player and stayed in the same player.
So we thought that was the same bug for the two other tables, one player was eliminated during the first round in the three games. -
• 当你想这么做时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
-
• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)？
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. -
• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
Impossible to finish the game because a player cannot play a card.
That happened at table 99339263 and 99330345 too. Second round with the wrong card distribution, same distribution like the first table. The last one, one player had 16, the other 8 and the 2 other players 12.
At the table 99330345 we tried to understand what happened and we shared our hands. We noticed on the second round, the cards not played by the eliminated player (4 cards not played) was not given to the next player and stayed in the same player.
So we thought that was the same bug for the two other tables, one player was eliminated during the first round in the three games. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
-
• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
-
• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. -
• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？
Impossible to finish the game because a player cannot play a card.
That happened at table 99339263 and 99330345 too. Second round with the wrong card distribution, same distribution like the first table. The last one, one player had 16, the other 8 and the 2 other players 12.
At the table 99330345 we tried to understand what happened and we shared our hands. We noticed on the second round, the cards not played by the eliminated player (4 cards not played) was not given to the next player and stayed in the same player.
So we thought that was the same bug for the two other tables, one player was eliminated during the first round in the three games. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
4 players setting
When we started the second round, one player had only 4 cards in hand, 2 players with 12 cards and the last one with 20 cards. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Safari v13.1
案件历史
Thanks to resolve the issue with the water sound.
The score was correctly noted at the end of the first round.
Otherwise we don't know why there is a phase with "Show results" and the necessity to click to pass. It is necessary to have that? Can you just pass to the next turn without clicking or just put a tempo if it is just to show the resolution of the higher tide?
I will think about your suggestion with the "Show results" state. For me it's important that there is enough time, that everybody can understand what's happened. And with a fixed time (for example 5-10 seconds), for some players it might be too long, for others too short.
In the current implementation, only max three not-drown players have to click "continue", it would also be possible to reduce that to two.
Good job. We really enjoyed to play and finish this game without issue ^^.
Just to know what is the difference if we play with 8 players there is more cards? or we just have less cards in hand?
For 6-8 players: the author is not convinced to offer this option, there is no physical variant for this game, it was my idea, and we have to test a little bit with more players.
Perhaps we'll finally only allow a 6 player option, where only 10 weather cards are dealt, and there are only tide cards from 1-10 in the deck, so that the game will not be too long because of the additional 6th round, which has to be played. Then also no additional weather cards would be needed,
But I would be happy, to get also feedback for the 6-8 players-option, also with the "short game" option, where less cards are dealt. The general idea is, to only add additional weather cards to the game, if required.
Examples:
8 players with full-game-length: then there are 8 x 12 = 96 weather cards with values 1-96. Again divided in 5 "equal" (as possible) sized sections with the number-colors yellow, green (half life preserver), blue (full life preserver), violet (half life preserver), red. Maybe a problem: 8 rounds need to be played, which could result in a long game.
7 players with short game option (8 weather cards are dealt): only 56 weather cards are needed, so we play with default 60 weather cards, but only 8 different tide cards (values 1-8) are in the deck. Problem: players need to remember, that 8 is the highest tide card, and not 12.
We never played with 5 players but you could expect between 18-20min. For my point of view if you play with 6 players with 10 weather cards and only 1 to 10 with tide cards. It could be the same time duration. Even if you have an additional round you will play 2 less cards per round, so each round is more quicker and the last round is the time you gain during the five first round.
For 7 and 8 players I think there are several issues possibles, in both configuration if you keep 60 weather cards which cards are removed from the game? Because with 7 or 8 players, 4 cards are removed and there is 5 groups of cards (yellow, green, blue, violet, red). It should be not fair to remove cards only in one group.
Furthermore if you add more cards, 12 cards more per player added (for 7 or 8). It is not possible to distribute fairly these new cards in the 5 different groups existing.
To resume, I think the 6 players mode is possible, that just change only the number of tide cards (1 to 10).
But for the 7-8 players settings, I am not sure that works correctly and fairly. But if you want to test the 7-8players settings, let me know. We could be 4 players available in real time (the same player in the two table) to try with other people.
I think the game is never really unfair, because everybody has to play a stage with everybody other's cards (there are that many stages as players in the game, so that is how often the cards are exchanged).
The main problems in other inofficial configurations are:
a) game may be too long
b) card value ranges are not like in the rules, which could be confusing for some people (although I display an explanation if the config option is selected)
So in this case if you want to keep the game quick with not too many change. The best way could be to keep the same number of weather cards and just adjust the number of tide cards in function of the number of players. In this configuration I think that the duration with 5-6-7 and 8 players setting could be the same duration because there is a balance between the number of cards to play and the number of round to do (more rounds to play but less cards to play, also the rounds are more quicker). Furthermore that did not require to change the weather cards at all and the number of life preservers.
增加一些新内容到这篇报告
- 其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
- 按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
- 问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
- 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
