所有案件
塞尼特(卅格戏)的案件
#18470: "calculation of scores to be reviewed"
#18470: "calculation of scores to be reviewed"
这个案件是关于哪方面的?
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
建议:依我来看,接下来的这些方法十分有助于改善游戏的实现
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
建议:依我来看,接下来的这些方法十分有助于改善游戏的实现
请检查是否已有同课题案件
若肯定,请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
细节描述
• 如果有的话,请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.
Punteggi poco chiari e poco corretti• 请说明你当时想做什么,你做了什么,然后发生了什么
• 你的浏览器是什么?
Google Chrome v83
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议,以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
Punteggi poco chiari e poco corretti• 你的浏览器是什么?
Google Chrome v83
• 当你被封锁的时候,屏幕上出现了些什么呢?(空白的屏幕?部分游戏平台画面?错误的信息?)
Punteggi poco chiari e poco corretti• 你的浏览器是什么?
Google Chrome v83
• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里?
Punteggi poco chiari e poco corretti• 在游戏回放中,是否有不符合游戏规则的地方?如果有的话,请问是在哪一步呢?
• 你的浏览器是什么?
Google Chrome v83
• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动?
Punteggi poco chiari e poco corretti• 你在想做什么的时候,触发了这个游戏选项?
• 当你想这么做时,发生了什么事(错误信息,游戏状态信息,......)?
• 你的浏览器是什么?
Google Chrome v83
• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)?
Punteggi poco chiari e poco corretti• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时,发生了什么事(错误信息,游戏状态信息,......)?
• 你的浏览器是什么?
Google Chrome v83
• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差),你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络,然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
Punteggi poco chiari e poco corretti• 你的浏览器是什么?
Google Chrome v83
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议,以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
Punteggi poco chiari e poco corretti• 你的浏览器是什么?
Google Chrome v83
案件历史
2020年6月 1日 9:22 • BarboRosso • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:
Già successo anche su Backgammon
A volte sono inspiegabili i punteggi.
Anche in questa partita ho perso 24 punti ed ero molto vicino all'avversario.
Per recuperarli bisogna spesso poi riuscire a vincere 2 partite.
Bisognerebbe introdurre una penalità anche per chi fa un sacco di partite inizialmente, poi arriva in cima alla classifica e per non scendere non fa più nessuno scontro...
Inserire per esempio minimo 1 match/day oppure si perdono X points
A volte sono inspiegabili i punteggi.
Anche in questa partita ho perso 24 punti ed ero molto vicino all'avversario.
Per recuperarli bisogna spesso poi riuscire a vincere 2 partite.
Bisognerebbe introdurre una penalità anche per chi fa un sacco di partite inizialmente, poi arriva in cima alla classifica e per non scendere non fa più nessuno scontro...
Inserire per esempio minimo 1 match/day oppure si perdono X points
2020年6月25日 16:56 • BarboRosso • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:
Already happened on Backgammon and many other games.
Sometimes the scores are inexplicable.
Also in this game I lost 24 points and I was very close to the opponent.
To retrieve them, you often need to win 2 games.
>>>> TIP valid for all Arena tables
A penalty should also be introduced for those who make a lot of parties initially, then arrive at the top of the ranking and to avoid going down, they no longer fight.
For example, enter at least 1 game / day or player loses X points
Sometimes the scores are inexplicable.
Also in this game I lost 24 points and I was very close to the opponent.
To retrieve them, you often need to win 2 games.
>>>> TIP valid for all Arena tables
A penalty should also be introduced for those who make a lot of parties initially, then arrive at the top of the ranking and to avoid going down, they no longer fight.
For example, enter at least 1 game / day or player loses X points
2021年3月27日 9:38 • BarboRosso • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:
absurd, I was second in Elite, lost with the third and I lost 20 points ... it is unlikely to recover them especially in games where luck has a big weight
2021年4月 6日 11:11 • BarboRosso • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:
In games where luck matters too much, you shouldn't use ELO, EAS or similar!!!
For example in Senet, Can't Stop, Backgammon or other similar games where the skill matter less, the probability of meeting a lower level player is VERY high, as well as the possibility of losing.
It is not true that a stronger one is more likely to win than a less strong one, it matters too much what comes out of the roll of the dice.
I think for these type of games that ELO or EAS scoring system is not fair.
FOR EXAMPLE:
- playing against a lower 7 position player (very close), winning I gained 19 points, losing I lost 24 (that's 20%, too much where luck counts so much).
- playing against a lower position (but in the same League, Elite) also makes you lose 30 points in case of defeat while only 6 points in case of victory.
For the same reason even if you play against with one of the same League (therefore at your level), which however is many positions below, you have a strong probability of losing a lot of points by losing and gaining very few in case of victory.
The probability for both players, however, is the same, because the skills counts too little, the luck with the dices counts more.
For example in Senet, Can't Stop, Backgammon or other similar games where the skill matter less, the probability of meeting a lower level player is VERY high, as well as the possibility of losing.
It is not true that a stronger one is more likely to win than a less strong one, it matters too much what comes out of the roll of the dice.
I think for these type of games that ELO or EAS scoring system is not fair.
FOR EXAMPLE:
- playing against a lower 7 position player (very close), winning I gained 19 points, losing I lost 24 (that's 20%, too much where luck counts so much).
- playing against a lower position (but in the same League, Elite) also makes you lose 30 points in case of defeat while only 6 points in case of victory.
For the same reason even if you play against with one of the same League (therefore at your level), which however is many positions below, you have a strong probability of losing a lot of points by losing and gaining very few in case of victory.
The probability for both players, however, is the same, because the skills counts too little, the luck with the dices counts more.
2021年4月 9日 8:04 • BarboRosso • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:
Another example #162593153 Can't Stop table
I already wrote in other post, about other game.
In games where luck matters more than player's skill, losing players should not be penalised, especially if they are close at the end of match (right now if not close in ranking, too many points are taken away).
It should have bonuses instead the winnings with greater distance like the table #162593153
I already wrote in other post, about other game.
In games where luck matters more than player's skill, losing players should not be penalised, especially if they are close at the end of match (right now if not close in ranking, too many points are taken away).
It should have bonuses instead the winnings with greater distance like the table #162593153
2021年4月 9日 12:55 • lavic • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:
I've been complaining about this MANY times. In Elite league there are NO players that are 10x worse or better than others. The players there are FILTERED, so awarding 36 points in such a game is RIDICULOUS and only serves to mess up the top 20 scores. Hence, top players don't play, hence the likelihood of getting a 36:4 game is pretty high.
2021年8月12日 1:06 • _demian_ • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:
I totally agree with BarboRosso, the Arena points is designed to penalise players who want to play, which I think goes against the spirit of the games.
Also particularly frustrating (and again, like BarboRosso said) when the games depends on luck (not all games are chess). For instance playing Yahtzee in the elite (around 1580 points) with another player who is in the elite (around 1450 points) penalised me on 28 points. But a victory on the same levels would give me 14. It is a mostly luck game, so there is kind of pointless to play once you get to the top 10/20 because you'll likely loose all your progress.
Maybe the game's luck factor could be included in the count so in a game like chess where luck has zero factor it can be harsh, on dice games where luck plays an important factor it can be less harsh, and games that are completely random (like connect4 where the winner is decided on who starts playing) it can be lesser harsh
Also particularly frustrating (and again, like BarboRosso said) when the games depends on luck (not all games are chess). For instance playing Yahtzee in the elite (around 1580 points) with another player who is in the elite (around 1450 points) penalised me on 28 points. But a victory on the same levels would give me 14. It is a mostly luck game, so there is kind of pointless to play once you get to the top 10/20 because you'll likely loose all your progress.
Maybe the game's luck factor could be included in the count so in a game like chess where luck has zero factor it can be harsh, on dice games where luck plays an important factor it can be less harsh, and games that are completely random (like connect4 where the winner is decided on who starts playing) it can be lesser harsh
增加一些新内容到这篇报告
任何可能重现这项漏洞或了解你的建议之相关资讯,都请在此填写:
- 其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
- 按 F5 是否解决了这个问题?
- 问题是否发生了好几次?还是每次都发生?还是时好时坏?
- 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差),你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络,然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
更改案件状态为:
bug?id=18470