报告 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

石器时代的案件

#17548: "not feeding the meeples at all gives an unfair advantage"

awaiting: 此建议尚未被开发者分析过

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

石器时代 #88180149

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

建议：依我来看，接下来的这些方法十分有助于改善游戏的实现

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

建议：依我来看，接下来的这些方法十分有助于改善游戏的实现

请检查是否已有同课题案件

若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

细节描述

案件历史

2020年May18日 00:33 • JurisFiction • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

2020年May18日 21:56 • JurisFiction • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

It happened again today, this time at table #88410883

2020年May31日 12:22 • Inaofr • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

The game is licensed, I can not add custom rules, they must be approved by Hans im Glück, the game publisher.
I already have rejected similar request in the past, it seems that people are not looking to rejected request before creating a new one, so I leave this one opened. But it won't be done.

2020年Jun11日 17:46 • ludique • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

That's called the starvation strategy, read about it on BGG.

It's not so easy to do : you lose 10 points every round, you refuse to win points by agriculture level, and you let other players have agriculture very easily.

2020年Jun11日 21:07 • RonaldMelodie • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

I don't like it either, but this is according to the rulebook of the board game. I suggest we don't make a difference on BGA unless the original game rules are changed by the publishers.

2020年Jun11日 22:53 • sfoozy • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

There is some things you can do to counter a starvation strategy. Also, there is nothing stopping you from starving your workers if you wanted (if you think that's the best strategy).

2020年Jul11日 06:28 • admitted • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

Starvation strategy is a valid strategy. As a top elo player, I can attest that starvation is a very weak strategy in 2p play (I have a much higher win rate against starvation, top elo players never use starvation) and it doesn't give much advantage even in 4p play. All you need to do is learn how to beat it :).

2020年Aug8日 20:57 • DarthTiberius • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

I tried this strategy for the first time earlier this week. I won, but as mentioned above, it's a rule, not a bug in the game. It mostly works if you can get babies on your first few turns, so if the opponents don't let you, then it won't work as well. Just beat it, or stop complaining.

2021年Feb9日 02:01 • Supergravity • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

Actually, the starvation strategy is quite effective in 3 or 4 player games, and you really can't do things to beat it by depriving the player of the opportunity to get babies, because then you are playing the same strategy but he has a 1 turn head start. The real problem with just saying "yes, the rules make this a strong strategy" is that it also takes one dimension (food choices) out of the game.
As mentioned by admitted, in 2-player, is usually suicide in high-level games; I've seen instances where a temporary 10-pt sacrifice was useful, but the pure "get babies and to heck with food" philosophy does not work well enough to beat 400's and up.

2021年May9日 14:46 • Jazzy111 • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

It is a strategy not a bug. It can be countered. Block the huts. They can’t regain the points if they can’t buy.

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

任何可能重现这项漏洞或了解你的建议之相关资讯，都请在此填写:

其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
如果你已截取此Bug的屏幕截图（好习惯），可使用任意图片托管服务（例如snipboard.io）上传后，将链接复制粘贴至此处。

取消更新报告

#17548: "not feeding the meeples at all gives an unfair advantage"

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

请检查是否已有同课题案件

细节描述

案件历史

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

更改案件状态为：

帮助

贡献

导航

关注我们