#166755: "Monster started with bleeding token already on it"
这个案件是关于哪方面的？
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
请检查是否已有同课题案件
若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
细节描述
-
• 如果有的话，请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.
I don't think the inquisitor in the final battle of Ramparts we had was supposed to have a bleeding token already on it.
-
• 请说明你当时想做什么，你做了什么，然后发生了什么
215
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v135
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
I don't think the inquisitor in the final battle of Ramparts we had was supposed to have a bleeding token already on it.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v135
-
• 当你被封锁的时候，屏幕上出现了些什么呢？(空白的屏幕？部分游戏平台画面？错误的信息？)
I don't think the inquisitor in the final battle of Ramparts we had was supposed to have a bleeding token already on it.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v135
-
• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里？
I don't think the inquisitor in the final battle of Ramparts we had was supposed to have a bleeding token already on it.
-
• 在游戏回放中，是否有不符合游戏规则的地方？如果有的话，请问是在哪一步呢？
215
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v135
-
• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动？
I don't think the inquisitor in the final battle of Ramparts we had was supposed to have a bleeding token already on it.
-
• 你在想做什么的时候，触发了这个游戏选项？
215
-
• 当你想这么做时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v135
-
• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)？
I don't think the inquisitor in the final battle of Ramparts we had was supposed to have a bleeding token already on it.
-
• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
215
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v135
-
• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
I don't think the inquisitor in the final battle of Ramparts we had was supposed to have a bleeding token already on it.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v135
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
I don't think the inquisitor in the final battle of Ramparts we had was supposed to have a bleeding token already on it.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Google Chrome v135
案件历史
Move 200 :9:21:00 AM
ntwest moves the group onto a new encounter tile
andyjwest is the new first player
A Shieldbearer spawns
A Inquisitor spawns
Move 201 :9:21:23 AM
ntwest plays a combat card
Move 202 :9:33:10 AM
andyjwest plays a combat card
Move 203 :9:33:12 AM
andyjwest plays a combat card
All players have chosen their combat actions
Move 204 :9:33:22 AM
andyjwest gains 1 shield
Move 205 :9:33:26 AM
ntwest gains 1 shield
Move 206 :9:33:27 AM
andyjwest gains 1 golden shield
Move 207 :9:38:10 AM
ntwest damages Inquisitor
Combat round 1 begins
Move 208 :9:38:16 AM
andyjwest sets Shieldbearer on fire
Move 209 :9:38:32 AM
andyjwest gains 1 golden shield
Move 210 :9:38:39 AM
ntwest damages Shieldbearer
Shieldbearer gains 1 shield
Shieldbearer gives 1 shield to Inquisitor
Combat round 2 begins
Move 211 :9:43:00 AM
Shieldbearer blocks andyjwest's attack
Inquisitor attacks
Move 212 :9:43:06 AM
andyjwest blocks an attack
Combat round 3 begins
Move 213 :9:43:13 AM
andyjwest freezes Inquisitor
Move 214 :9:43:21 AM
ntwest sets Shieldbearer on fire
The group kills Shieldbearer
The group receives a gold tooth
Move 215 :9:43:52 AM
The group loots a cell
Inquisitor bleeds to death
The group kills Inquisitor
The group receives a gold tooth
The group receives a cell
The combat is over
Note back at move 130:
Move 130 :6:43:49 AM
ntwest bleeds Inquisitor
That combat ended with Inquisitor being killed by damage not bleeding.
I tracked down and fixed the reason this happened:
Your group uncovered all combat tiles in the Ramparts and there are not enough cards in the enemy deck, so the discard gets reshuffled to draw the remaining one.
When killing the Inquisitor (B3-10) for the first time, its state flags did not get erased. So when it spawned again, they were still there.
By the way, this is an oversight in game design as confirmed by the publisher. There should be enough monsters in the deck :-)
增加一些新内容到这篇报告
- 其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
- 按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
- 问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
- 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
