#163615: "Third dominance check. UI shows tie but points awarded as if no tie"
这个案件是关于哪方面的？
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
请检查是否已有同课题案件
若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
细节描述
-
• 如果有的话，请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• 请说明你当时想做什么，你做了什么，然后发生了什么
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 当你被封锁的时候，屏幕上出现了些什么呢？(空白的屏幕？部分游戏平台画面？错误的信息？)
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里？
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• 在游戏回放中，是否有不符合游戏规则的地方？如果有的话，请问是在哪一步呢？
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动？
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• 你在想做什么的时候，触发了这个游戏选项？
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
-
• 当你想这么做时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)？
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. -
• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？
Yes. The last move since it ended the game by runaway score.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
Third dominance check tie vs Wakhan. Russia dominant. Human player 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Wakhan 3 Russian loyalty/influence according to UI. Tie. But Wakhan got 5 points and Human got 3 points instead of 8 divided by 2 for 4 each.
Dominance check resolutions need more explanation. How points awarded is inscrutable and frustrates new players trying to learn the rules. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
案件历史
Russian was the dominant coalition. You were loyal to Russian.
You had 1pt for loyalty plus one patriot and one prize for three total points.
The Wakhan had 1pt for loyalty plus two prizes and one gift for four total points.
It is correct that the Wakhan score 5 and you score 3. It was not a tie.
The Wakhan only bought the gift the turn before so you may have missed this.
However, the summary scoring for the Wakhan does seem to be wrong. It shows only 3pts for Russian whereas it should show 4pts. The Afghan (2pt) and British (5pt) appear correct.
I’d look at move 68, for when she betrayed a card to gain a Russian patriot. That saw her summary score remain as 1, not increase to 2 as it should. She had only just radicalized that card as her first action in her turn and possibly that caused the error in her tally of influence, but I’m speculating.
增加一些新内容到这篇报告
- 其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
- 按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
- 问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
- 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。
