• 如果有的话，请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 请说明你当时想做什么，你做了什么，然后发生了什么

Noted above inline.

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？

Noted above inline.

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 当你被封锁的时候，屏幕上出现了些什么呢？(空白的屏幕？部分游戏平台画面？错误的信息？)

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里？

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 在游戏回放中，是否有不符合游戏规则的地方？如果有的话，请问是在哪一步呢？

Noted above inline.

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动？

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 你在想做什么的时候，触发了这个游戏选项？

Noted above inline.

• 当你想这么做时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)？

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？

Noted above inline.

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？

Noted above inline.

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。

All issues noted are lefalaf's turn/board. I checked each move of my opponent as well, but found no issues with scoring their plays.

Only changes to the score differential to expected are noted so that only cards (used) with potential data issues are listed here.

Move 18
card with 3 flowers, 1 gravel, and backwards L of path surrounding a flower
expected score of 17, game gives 15
(Note: The next card on this board is similar, but the L encloses gravel - that 2nd one netted out fine. This note is just to be clear the first of these similar cards played by lefalaf is the one with the scoring issue.)

Move 40
4 strawberry card
carryover score differential from move 18 was -2, increased to -3
expected 10, game reports 7

Move 43
birdbath, 2 berry, 1, flower, L path
differential of -3 increased to -5
expected 15, game reports 10

Move 48
two root, pond, gravel, straight path
differential increased from -5 to -10
expected 23, game shows 13

Move 55
2 berry, 1 flower, grey statue?, L path
differential increased from -10 to -15
expected 40, game shows 25

The differential did not change the rest of the game.

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？