报告 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

展翅翱翔的案件

#119181: "Sets of eggs miscalculated. Blue player had 2 sets but was given points for 4."

notabug: 这不是一个漏洞

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

展翅翱翔 #493478961

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

规则：有一条游戏规则没写进游戏程序里

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

规则：有一条游戏规则没写进游戏程序里

请检查是否已有同课题案件

若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

细节描述

案件历史

2024年Mar30日 01:22 • EaseHeaten • 漏洞尚未被修复:

Refreshed page but bug remained

2024年Mar30日 01:55 • greenjacket124 • 漏洞尚未被修复:

For some reason, the blue player has an egg in the wetland row that's not on an egg. That seems the most likely source of the issue.

2024年Mar31日 20:23 • EaseHeaten • 漏洞尚未被修复:

Watched preplay and at move 197 (end of round 3) the board shows blue player awareded points for four sets of eggs, which is impossible because:
1. Blue would only be able to get a maximum of 2 sets from his first column, due to Peregrine Falcon (2 egg capacity);
2. No card played in forest row 2, meaning no sets of eggs in row 2 or beyond, meaning Blue player should only have received points for 2 sets of eggs instead of 4.

2024年Aug26日 06:31 • Anyannka • 漏洞尚未被修复:

I had the same issue where in table Wingspan #554609029 purple had 7 points for 7 sets of eggs, however they only had 2 sets of eggs by the end of the game, which should have resulted in much fewer points. Please see move #233 you can see they laid 4 eggs and the final situation. Yet they were awarded for 7 rows for some reson. Please fix this
screenshot of the situation:
imgur.com/a/qrejvTP

2024年Nov3日 02:18 • toranagaBS • 漏洞尚未被修复:

My sets of eggs (round 4) were ignored.

2024年Nov15日 18:00 • Mantsa • 漏洞尚未被修复:

Table ID 589325585
My sets of eggs were ignored, should have gotten 5 points.

2024年Nov22日 23:56 • API21 • 漏洞尚未被修复:

Même constat : le calcul des séries d'œufs est erroné. Une série d'œufs est une colonne complète avec un oiseau dans chaque habitat (forêt, plaine et eau) ayant au moins un œuf sur chaque oiseau. Or dans la partie jouée, c'est le nombre d'œufs qui a été pris en compte à partir du moment où au moins une colonne complète avait été posée. Le score final a donné 3 joueurs ex aequo alors que j'étais la seule à avoir 2 séries complètes, les autres joueurs n'ayant pas fini leur 2ème colonne.

2024年Nov23日 00:16 • API21 • 漏洞尚未被修复:

Voici la référence de la Table #586402161

2025年May12日 13:31 • thebeccia • 漏洞尚未被修复:

Tavolo #672011732 same error. in the third round i had 4 sets of eggs, counted zero. my opponent had zero, counted 4

2025年Jul3日 18:16 • megsb2022 • 漏洞尚未被修复:

I also have this problem. The bonus shows my opponent has 3 sets and I have 1. I have screen shots to show we both have 2 sets of 3

2025年Jul3日 18:17 • megsb2022 • 漏洞尚未被修复:

imgur.com/a/NCkD2ZI

2025年Jul26日 16:31 • SicutInCaelo • 漏洞尚未被修复:

F5 did not solve the problem. My egg set count didn't seem to register at all during the round (I was always showing zero even when I had one and then again when I had three at the end of the round.

2025年Aug29日 12:34 • ollyfish2002 • 漏洞尚未被修复:

same for me in this game
boardgamearena.com/4/wingspan?table=722104169&replayLastTurn=1&replayLastTurnPlayer=83903889

2025年Sep23日 00:41 • Mathew5000 • 漏洞尚未被修复:

After reading through the reports on this page, I believe that the people contributing here are mistaken. In my opinion this should be marked "not a bug".

You can read the explanation for sets of eggs in the Wingspan rulebook appendix: snipboard.io/kdDXQ1.jpg "For this goal you're only counting the eggs in each habitat. It does not matter on which bird or columns the eggs are placed."

Equivalently, your number of sets of eggs can be defined as the number of eggs in your habitat with the fewest eggs (credit: www.reddit.com/r/wingspan/comments/s3tbwe/comment/hsmq0sx/ )

Just to take one player's report above, Thebeccia writes: "Tavolo #672011732 same error. in the third round i had 4 sets of eggs, counted zero. my opponent had zero, counted 4" But that is apparently based on the misapprehension that a set of eggs means three eggs on one bird. I looked at the replay in question boardgamearena.com/gamereview?table=672011732 and when I jumped ahead to move #189 I can see that Thebeccia (Red) has 0 eggs in wetlands and so is correctly scored with 0 sets of eggs. Green has 4 or more eggs in each habitat, and therefore is correctly scored with 4 sets of eggs; Orange has 3 eggs in forest, 7 in grasslands, and 3 in wetlands, and therefore is correctly scored with 3 sets of eggs.

2025年Sep23日 01:06 • paramesis • 这不是一个漏洞:

Matthew5000 is correct. This is NOT A BUG. Thank you so much for looking at the individual reports. This is a very common rules misunderstanding that will always show up as a bug report, despite the rule being directly written into the interface.

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

任何可能重现这项漏洞或了解你的建议之相关资讯，都请在此填写:

其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

取消更新报告

#119181: "Sets of eggs miscalculated. Blue player had 2 sets but was given points for 4."

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

请检查是否已有同课题案件

细节描述

案件历史

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

更改案件状态为：

帮助

贡献

导航

关注我们