#115339: "Please add option for simultaneous harvests"
这个案件是关于哪方面的?
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
请检查是否已有同课题案件
若肯定,请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
细节描述
-
• 如果有的话,请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. -
• 请说明你当时想做什么,你做了什么,然后发生了什么
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
-
• 请以英文复制/粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你已截取此Bug的屏幕截图(好习惯),可使用任意图片托管服务(例如snipboard.io)上传后,将链接复制粘贴至此处。 这段文本在翻译系统中吗?如果存在,它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时?
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议,以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
-
• 当你被封锁的时候,屏幕上出现了些什么呢?(空白的屏幕?部分游戏平台画面?错误的信息?)
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
-
• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里?
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. -
• 在游戏回放中,是否有不符合游戏规则的地方?如果有的话,请问是在哪一步呢?
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
-
• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动?
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. -
• 你在想做什么的时候,触发了这个游戏选项?
-
• 当你想这么做时,发生了什么事(错误信息,游戏状态信息,......)?
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
-
• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)?
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. -
• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时,发生了什么事(错误信息,游戏状态信息,......)?
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
-
• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你已截取此Bug的屏幕截图(好习惯),可使用任意图片托管服务(例如snipboard.io)上传后,将链接复制粘贴至此处。
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
-
• 请以英文复制/粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你已截取此Bug的屏幕截图(好习惯),可使用任意图片托管服务(例如snipboard.io)上传后,将链接复制粘贴至此处。 这段文本在翻译系统中吗?如果存在,它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时?
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议,以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
I believe that harvests should be simultaneous. There are so many harvests that each take so many individual steps, and for each one you have to wait for each player to take each step, and they have almost no interaction among the players. I can think of fringe cases where what someone else does might influence what you do for the harvest, but it's so minor that for most games I believe it's not worth the additional ~hundred turns they add to the game, it makes the game basically unplayable in turn-based.
Perhaps there could be an option when you are creating the game for either "turn-based" harvests (like the current functionality) or "simultaneous harvests" (where as soon as you go into the harvest phase, everyone does their own personal harvest). The people who really care about being able to see what other people do for their harvest can keep using the current functionality, while people who don't care can make their games a week shorter. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢?
Mozilla v5
案件历史
A short calculation on the back of a napkin implies that simultaneous harvests would shave of about 15% of time in a turn based Caverna game, which is significant.
By now I have played hundreds of games. I don't think I was ever influenced by what opponents were doing during harvest.
The biggest waste of time during harvest is breeding, where the game halts to have you reorganize your animals, while there is plenty of space. And also when you have a ruby but no possibility to create a new breeding pair.
Instead of doing it simultaneously, automatically completing the turn of each player that cannot or don't want to do anything particular will speed it up a lot, while still allowing those who need to reorder animals or want to use rubies the chance to do so.
增加一些新内容到这篇报告
- 其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
- 按 F5 是否解决了这个问题?
- 问题是否发生了好几次?还是每次都发生?还是时好时坏?
- 如果你已截取此Bug的屏幕截图(好习惯),可使用任意图片托管服务(例如snipboard.io)上传后,将链接复制粘贴至此处。
