• 如果有的话，请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来.

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 请说明你当时想做什么，你做了什么，然后发生了什么

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 当你被封锁的时候，屏幕上出现了些什么呢？(空白的屏幕？部分游戏平台画面？错误的信息？)

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里？

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 在游戏回放中，是否有不符合游戏规则的地方？如果有的话，请问是在哪一步呢？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动？

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 你在想做什么的时候，触发了这个游戏选项？

• 当你想这么做时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)？

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？

• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。

I was surprised in boardgamearena.com/table?table=471127726 when at the end of my turn, the game suddenly ended. I knew there was a dominance check card in the market which might be triggered by chance at the end of a turn, or deliberately by an opponent, but this was only the third dominance check. There was no dominant coalition. I had 5 cylinders on the board and another player also had 5 cylinders. The game log reads:

A Dominance Check is resolved
RustyTank scores 4 victory point(s)
Mathew5000 scores 4 victory point(s)
There is no dominant coalition. The Dominance Check is unsuccessful.
The end of the game: RustyTank wins!
snipboard.io/sJMxOq.jpg

This seemed like a bug, as the rules specifically give an example of a case like this, with a tie for cylinders after an unsuccessful dominance check: two players tied for first place will both score two points ((3+1)÷2)". We thought that the software forgot to divide by two, and just awarded each of us the four points, for both first and second. We thought that the reason the game had ended is that one player was ahead by 4 VP (which only happened because, we thought, too many points had been awarded). We had to read through the rules two more times before finding the passage where it says that if the fourth Dominance card comes out when the third one is already in the market, then it will be considered as the final dominance check, and the passage on a different page where it says that the points are doubled for the final dominance check.

So this was not a software bug but we would not have been so confused if the game log were more verbose in explaining this. At the very least, the game log should note when the final dominance check is occurring, and it should expressly state that points have been doubled. Additionally, I think the game log should also mention that because of thie Instability, the third Dominance Check is deemed to be the final one. Finally, the game log should set out more explicitly how the points are calculated. Instead of just saying I score 4 victory points, I'd like to see the notation that it is 3 points for first place, doubled, plus 1 point for second place, doubled, divided by the number of tied players, 2

• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？