报告 • Board Game Arena

所有案件

重塑火星的案件

#108233: "House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"

rejected: 开发者认为这是个馊主意，或投资报酬率过低

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

重塑火星 #453033785

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

建议：依我来看，接下来的这些方法十分有助于改善游戏的实现

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

建议：依我来看，接下来的这些方法十分有助于改善游戏的实现

请检查是否已有同课题案件

若肯定，请「投票」给这桩案件。最高票的案件将「优先」处理！

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

细节描述

案件历史

2023年Dec22日 18:44 • startrekchekov • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

it should be implemented as a game setup option (no defer).

2024年Jan26日 05:22 • Karlsen • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

It should be (very) optional, as it is against the actual rules of the game.

2024年Feb4日 17:57 • Supergravity • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

I agree this would be a nice rule-variance option, but it should not delay going to Beta or full release.

2024年Feb16日 17:38 • Mr_yoso • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

I agree that this should only be a (very) optional set up, as intentionally slowing down your moves is a feature of the game's design. some cards actively benefit from slowing your play, like if you get a bonus for played space cards, you may want to slow your play so that other players use their space cards first.

2024年Mar20日 05:53 • bananasplay • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

Not a fan of implementing everyone's pet house rules, even if as a table option (because then players have more things to evaluate to ensure that they the table they're considering joining doesn't have any of these implemented). Consider this a downvote on the entire idea.

2024年Mar20日 14:54 • xspuipuke • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

Consider me downvoting this too.

2024年Mar20日 16:13 • Corwin007 • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

I'd pretty much be against this one for the reasons already stated, I'd have to screen games to make sure the option is not on, and since it's not an official option I'd rather not see this implemented.

2024年Mar21日 16:19 • Lumin_S • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

I'm a big supporter of this house rule, and it does speed things up nicely without changing very much in the game. That said all house rule options would need publisher approval, so... anyone want to get in touch with the publisher and try to convince them it's a good idea?

2024年Mar24日 20:10 • UkaSpaceElevator • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

Downvote

2024年Mar25日 23:23 • frotes • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

+1 this variant. It can make async play much better and detracts little from the play experience

of course this would be an optional setup choice

2024年Mar30日 14:46 • Victoria_La • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

Report short description
"game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"
changed to
"House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"

2024年Apr16日 17:48 • RoyalRook • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

+1, especially for turn base games. It can only improve the state of the play.

2024年Apr30日 00:57 • Shiny_Charizard • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

I guess as long as there is an option this shouldn't matter, but I will always vote against this.
It takes so much away from the game strategy, so much for no gain.

BGA already has fast turn options for those who feel like the game is too slow without it.

2024年May20日 12:48 • Grunman • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

Downvote

2024年Aug7日 17:24 • Yahyra • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

I agree with 'downvote' for this. I suggest finding friends /like minded players and agreeing to play in this manner.

2024年Aug14日 12:52 • eggjasalat • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

Downvote

2024年Aug17日 06:35 • ArchDevious • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

I love this, please. Small reduction in strategy for a huge increase in quality of play, especially for async game

2024年Sep12日 14:05 • tomcattomcat • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

No support.

2024年Nov4日 08:39 • perfectgeneral • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

This is against the letter and spirit of the rules. Down vote.

2024年Nov21日 09:39 • HelmsDeepSleeper • 此建议尚未被开发者分析过:

Downvote. This is against the game rules

2025年Sep27日 18:46 • FrankJones • 开发者认为这是个馊主意，或投资报酬率过低:

This is not how Terraform Mars is played.

2025年Sep29日 16:53 • frotes • 开发者认为这是个馊主意，或投资报酬率过低:

that's a disappointing decision.

I would understand if dev didn't want to put in the work to add the option but to just say it isn't part of the game as the reason.. well it's suggested as a variant. One that has been used in even tournaments before

Having an option choice also does not impact any players that want to play the game with rules as written.

2025年Oct2日 02:29 • happy-smile • 开发者认为这是个馊主意，或投资报酬率过低:

I guess it depends what is official stand of BGA towards the houserules. I heard that they don't implement them unless confirmed directly with designers/publishers. Not sure if that is true.

2025年Oct2日 03:16 • FrankJones • 开发者认为这是个馊主意，或投资报酬率过低:

It's true. And, this is a terrible house rule.

It is rejected. The game allows players do 1 or 2 actions. It's absurd nonsense that people want to force everyone to take 2 actions.

End of discussion.

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

任何可能重现这项漏洞或了解你的建议之相关资讯，都请在此填写:

其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
如果你有这个系统漏洞发生时的屏幕截图(画质不要太差)，你可以使用Imgur.com来把它上传到网络，然后将链接复制/粘贴到这里来。

取消更新报告

#108233: "House Rule: game setup option: mandatory two moves or pass (no defering / skip 2nd action)"

这个案件是关于哪方面的？

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

发生什么事? 请从下方选择

请检查是否已有同课题案件

细节描述

案件历史

增加一些新内容到这篇报告

更改案件状态为：

帮助

贡献

导航

关注我们