#102878: "No color won, the game should have been a complete draw, but it still went to normal tie breakers"
这个案件是关于哪方面的？
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
发生什么事? 请从下方选择
请检查是否已有相同主题的报告
如果有，请「投票」给这份报告。最高票的报告将「优先」处理！
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
细节描述
-
• 如果有的话，请将你在屏幕上所看到的错误信息粘贴出来。
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• 请说明你当时想做什么，你做了什么，然后发生了什么
End game.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你已截取此Bug的屏幕截图（好习惯），可使用任意图片托管服务（例如snipboard.io）上传后，将链接复制粘贴至此处。 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 当你被封锁的时候，屏幕上出现了些什么呢？(空白的屏幕？部分游戏平台画面？错误的信息？)
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 哪个规则没有被BGA的设计小组写进游戏里？
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• 在游戏回放中，是否有不符合游戏规则的地方？如果有的话，请问是在哪一步呢？
End game.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 你当时是想做哪个游戏行动？
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• 你在想做什么的时候，触发了这个游戏选项？
End game.
-
• 当你想这么做时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请问这个问题发生在游戏的哪个阶段(当前的游戏说明是什么)？
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• 当你想进行一个游戏行动时，发生了什么事(错误信息，游戏状态信息，......)？
End game.
• 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请描述一下显示画面上面的问题。 如果你已截取此Bug的屏幕截图（好习惯），可使用任意图片托管服务（例如snipboard.io）上传后，将链接复制粘贴至此处。
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请以英文复制／粘贴显示文字而非你的语言。 如果你已截取此Bug的屏幕截图（好习惯），可使用任意图片托管服务（例如snipboard.io）上传后，将链接复制粘贴至此处。 这段文本在翻译系统中吗？如果存在，它被翻译是否已超过二十四小时？
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
-
• 请简明而精确地解释您的建议，以便让人明白您想表达的意思。
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • 您正使用哪一款浏览器呢？
Mozilla v5
案件历史
boardgamegeek.com/thread/3002700/question-no-one-wins-and-losing-faction
And here is where she says all these rule clarifications are correct
boardgamegeek.com/filepage/252122/turncoats-rules-end-game-clarifications
Which includes this clarification:
2. WINNING FACTION
The Faction that rules the most areas wins.
If tied, the tied faction with the most stone on the axe wins.
If still tied, the still tied faction with the most stone on the flag wins.
If still tied, there is no winning faction and there is no winning player.
This game ended the same way, it shouldn't be that easy to force a win, just end the game on a color tie with less stones?
boardgamegeek.com/thread/3161778/all-factions-lose-no-player-wins-or-least-stones-w/page/1
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
增加一些新内容到这篇报告
- 其他的游戏桌 ID / 移动 ID
- 按 F5 是否解决了这个问题？
- 问题是否发生了好几次？还是每次都发生？还是时好时坏？
- 如果你已截取此Bug的屏幕截图（好习惯），可使用任意图片托管服务（例如snipboard.io）上传后，将链接复制粘贴至此处。
